Publication_Breil

Yavuz, S. et al. (2025), Development of a pro-adaptive wrist-worn wearable device for Parkinson disease symptoms: Concept and initial approach

Title

Yavuz, S., Grashof, R., Nitsche, T., Breil, B., and Naroska, E. (2025). Development of a pro-adaptive wrist-worn wearable device for Parkinson disease symptoms: Concept and initial approach, Abstracts of the 2025 Joint Annual Conference of the Austrian (ÖGBMT), German (VDE DGBMT) and Swiss (SSBE) Societies for Biomedical Engineering Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik, vol. 70, no. s1, 2025, pp. 1-374.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2025-1001

Grashof et al. (2025). Interviews zur nutzerorientierten Entwicklung pro-adaptiver kognitiver Assistenzsysteme: Bedürfnisse von Alzheimer-Patienten.

Title

Grashof, R., Yavuz, S., Gräbel, J. and Breil, B. (2025). Interviews zur nutzerorientierten Entwicklung pro-adaptiver kognitiver Assistenzsysteme: Bedürfnisse von Alzheimer-Patienten. 70. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie e.V. (GMDS)

Abstract: grashof2025_gmds_abstract.pdf

Poster: grashof2025_gmds_poster.pdf

Grashof R, Lipprandt M, Breil B. Cognitive assistive technologies for degenerative diseases and related evaluation methods: A scoping review. GMS Med Inform Biom Epidemiol. 2025;21:Doc09.

Title

Grashof R, Lipprandt M, Breil B. Cognitive assistive technologies for degenerative diseases and related evaluation methods: A scoping review. GMS Med Inform Biom Epidemiol. 2025;21:Doc09.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3205/mibe000281

Abstract

Assistive technologies (ATs) are crucial for people with degenerative diseases that affect cognitive functions. To date, no comprehensive review has systematically examined these technologies and their evaluation methods. To outline the current state of research, we conducted a scoping review on cognitive ATs that provide direct assistance. From an initial pool of 107 review articles identified in Web of Science and other sources over the last five years we selected ten for further analysis. To enhance clarity and interpretability, the findings were organized into thematic categories, distinguishing types of assistive technologies as well as evaluation approaches used across studies.